Can PR professionals write anything?
That’s not to say something like a novel, but if one PR professional focuses on a niche, say the financial services sector, can that person switch to writing about a loaf of bread?
If the individual is a writer in the true sense – not just someone that ‘works in PR’ – then the answer is ‘yes’. To me, it’s a minimum requirement for all PR professionals to have the ability to write; to produce high-quality copy and content, no matter the brief, given enough time to do the necessary research.
Most of the writing I have done over the past several years has centred on the marine industry. It’s pretty technical in some cases (you have to know bow roller from stern drive, or sonar from radar, for example) but also comes with a healthy mix of consumer and luxury lifestyle.
My point of view is good copywriters (which PR people ought to be) should be able to meet most briefs regardless of their day-to-day bread-and-butter writing.
There will, of course, be extremes – hardcore science writing, for example, does require some level of scientific knowledge or understanding – but for the most part it’s not rocket science to adapt to a new language and audience (and there’s always a dictionary, thesaurus or Google to help out when needed).
Copy requirements come in all shapes and sizes. With so many different channels to communicate via today, it’s important to be able to turn the keyboard to each task and specific audience. Today’s content often has to multitask across print and digital – website copy, media releases, search engine optimised (SEO) copy, brochures, feature articles, trade/news columns, advertising copy, print and e-newsletters / electronic direct mail (eDMs), technical specs, sales copy, blogging, social media… it goes on.
A lot of print-specific copy will also make it onto digital platforms and has to be written (or edited retrospectively) for both print and online readers. Yet good feature writing for print should be written for its own audience’s journey, not with the online reader in mind.
It’s a lot easier to produce copy about something you’re interested in, of course. If your writing passion is fishing, it’s unlikely you’ll have a taste for mortgages and lending rates (although there will always be exceptions). That said, it is likely, if required, the fishing specialist could do the research and turn out quality, concise copy on financial topics.

The marine industry revolves around technology in many ways. Even when talking about a luxury vessel, there is almost always some technology used as a differentiator. I’ve written media content for software development kits, hydrodynamic models, GRIBs for tactical software, multi-directional propulsion systems, computer-aided design, consumer electronics, maritime software – the challenge of turning complexity into simplicity is a great one, even more so when the brief includes making it newsworthy.
Does an immersion in marine technology, and the marine industry, mean I’m tied to that set of communications channels, media or language? Would the same apply to a financial services PR practitioner or a technology PR person?
I don’t think so.
Creating compelling copy is simply a matter of research – in the subject, technology, product, audience, media channels, network – and an adherence to the brief.
What do you think?
Notes